Economic issues have occupied people's minds throughout the ages. Aristotle and Plato in ancient Greece wrote about problems of wealth, property, and trade. Both were prejudiced against commerce, feeling that to live by trade was undesirable. The Romans borrowed their economic ideas from the Greeks and showed the same contempt for trade. During the Middle Ages the economic ideas of the Roman Catholic church were expressed in the canon law, which condemned usury (the taking of interest for money loaned) and regarded commerce as inferior to agriculture.Economics as a subject of modern study, distinguishable from moral philosophy and politics, dates from the work, Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776), by the Scottish philosopher and economist Adam Smith. Mercantilism and physiocracy were precursors of the classical economics of Smith and his 19th-century successors. A. MercantilismThe development of modern nationalism during the 16th century shifted attention to the problem of increasing the wealth and power of the various nation-states. The economic policy of the leaders of that time, known as mercantilism, sought to encourage national self-sufficiency. The heyday of the mercantilist school in England and western Europe occurred during the 16th through the early 18th centuries.Mercantilists valued gold and silver as an index of national power. Without the gold and silver mines in the New World from which Spain drew its riches, a nation could accumulate these precious metals only by selling more merchandise to foreigners than it bought from them. This favorable balance of trade necessarily compelled foreigners to cover their deficits by shipping gold and silver.Mercantilists took for granted that their own country was either at war with its neighbors, recovering from a recent conflict, or getting ready to plunge into a new war. With gold and silver, a ruler could hire mercenaries to fight, a practice followed by King George III of the United Kingdom of Great Britain when he used Hessian troops during the American Revolution. As needed, the monarch could also buy weapons, uniforms, and food to supply the soldiers and sailors.Mercantilist preoccupation with precious metals also inspired several domestic policies. It was vital for a nation to keep wages low and the population large and growing. A large, ill-paid population produced more goods to be sold at low prices to foreigners. Ordinary men and women were encouraged to work hard and avoid such extravagances as tea, gin, ribbons, ruffles, and silks. It also followed that the earlier that children began to work, the better it was for their country's prosperity. One mercantilist writer had a plan for children of the poor: “When these children are four years old, they shall be sent to the county workhouse and there taught to read two hours a day and be kept fully employed the rest of the time in any of the manufactures of the house which best suits their age, strength, and capacity.” B. PhysiocracyPhysiocracy was briefly in vogue in France during the second half of the 18th century as a reaction against the narrow and restrictive policies of mercantilism. The founder of the school, François Quesnay, was a physician at the royal court of King Louis XV. His major work, the Tableau économique, an attempt to trace income flows through the economy, crudely anticipated 20th-century national income accounting. All wealth, in the doctrine of the physiocrats, originates in agriculture; through trade, wealth is distributed from farmers to other groups. The physiocrats were partisans of free trade and laissez-faire. They maintained that the revenue of the state should be raised by a single direct tax levied on the land. Adam Smith met the leading physiocrats and wrote—for the most part, favorably—of their doctrines. C.Classical school
As a coherent economic theory, classical economics starts with Smith, continues with the British economists Thomas Robert Malthus and David Ricardo, and culminates in the synthesis of John Stuart Mill, who as a young man was a follower of Ricardo. Although differences of opinion were numerous among the classical economists in the three-quarters of a century between Smith's Wealth of Nations and Mill's Principles of Political Economy (1848), members of the group agreed on major principles. All believed in private property, free markets, and, in Mill's words, that “only through the principle of competition has political economy any pretension to the character of a science.” They shared Smith's strong suspicion of government and his ardent confidence in the power of self-interest represented by his famous “invisible hand,” which reconciled public benefit with individual pursuit of private gain. From Ricardo, classicists derived the notion of diminishing returns, which held that as more labor and capital were applied to land, yields after “a certain and not very advanced stage in the progress of agriculture steadily diminished.”English philosopher-economist John Stuart Mill was one of the most important thinkers of the 19th century. The son of English philosopher James Mill, he refined and elaborated on the work of his father and of English philosopher-economist Jeremy Bentham in his book Utilitarianism (1863). Utilitarian philosophers argued that all decisions could be made according to the principal of the greatest “utility,” or benefit, to the greatest number of people. In this section from the end of the work, Mill discussed the issue of criminal punishment and examined how it related to concepts of justice and fairness and to the doctrine of utility.Through Smith's emphasis on consumption, rather than on production, the scope of economics was considerably broadened. Smith was optimistic about the chances of improving general standards of life. He called attention to the importance of permitting individuals to follow their self-interest as a means of promoting national prosperity.Scottish economist and philosopher Adam Smith made a dramatic advance in economic theory with An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes ofthe Wealth of Nations (1776). It was the first work to establish political economy as a subject of study in its own right. Smith asserts that the distribution of wealth—which can be broken down into the basic forms of wages, rent, and profits—is most efficiently accomplished through free trade without government interference.Malthus, on the other hand, in his enormously influential book An Essay on the Principle of Population (1798), imparted a tone of gloom to classical economics, arguing that hopes for prosperity were fated to founder on the rock of excessive population growth. Food, he believed, would increase in arithmetic ratio (2-4-6-8-10 and so on), but population tended to double in each generation (2-4-8-16-32 and so on) unless that doubling was checked either by nature or human prudence. According to Malthus, nature's check was “positive”: “The power of population is so superior to the power of the earth to produce subsistence for man, that premature death must in some shape or other visit the human race.” The shapes it took included war, epidemics, pestilence and plague, human vices, and famine, all combining to level the world's population with the world's food supply.Malthus: From Principle of PopulationThe first version of British economist Thomas Malthus’s An Essay on the Principle of Population appeared anonymously in 1798 and achieved instant notoriety. Malthus predicted that the productive capacity of the world’s resources, especially agriculture, ultimately could never increase quickly enough to sustain the needs of a human population that was undergoing unchecked growth. This excerpt from A Summary View of the Principle of Population (1830) revealed several finer points in Malthus’s philosophy. For example, Malthus stated that natural checks on population growth, such as the limited availability of food and productive land, could work to prevent overpopulation by causing people to marry later in life and to have fewer children.The only escape from population pressure and the horrors of the positive check was in voluntary limitation of population, not by contraception, rejected on religious grounds by Malthus, but by late marriage and, consequently, smaller families. These pessimistic doctrines of classical economists earned for economics the epithet of the “dismal science.”Mill's Principles of Political Economy was the leading text on the subject until the end of the 19th century. Although Mill accepted the major theories of his classical predecessors, he held out more hope than did Ricardo and Malthus that the working class could be educated into rational limitation of their own numbers. Mill was also a reformer who was quite willing to tax inheritances heavily and even to allow government a larger role in protecting children and workers. He was far more critical than other classical economists of business behavior and favored worker ownership of factories. Mill thus represents a bridge between classical laissez-faire economics and an emerging welfare state.The classical economists also accepted Say's Law of Markets, the doctrine of the French economist Jean Baptiste Say. Say's law holds that the danger of general unemployment or “glut” in a competitive economy is negligible because supply tends to create its own matching demand up to the limit of human labor and the natural resources available for production. Each enlargement of output adds to the wages and other incomes that constitute the funds needed to purchase added output.HISTORIC DOCUMENTS Many Socialist and Communist tracts were published in the early and mid-19th century, but the succinct expression of Socialist ideas and the dramatic rhetoric helped make The Communist Manifesto (1848) the central text of modern Socialism. In this excerpt from Part I, German political philosopher Karl Marx advanced the idea that the history of society is the history of struggle between the oppressed and their oppressors. Marx based the Manifesto in part on a draft prepared by German revolutionary political economist Friedrich Engels.
In 1842 a young German economist named Friedrich Engels was sent to learn business methods at a spinning mill in Manchester, England. There he came face to face with the unfair treatment of factory workers. Soon to become the cofounder of modern Communist ideology along with German philosopher Karl Marx, Engels based his first important revolutionary writings on this experience. The Condition of the Working Class in England (1844) describes the harsh conditions faced by industrial workers, miners, and agricultural laborers in early 19th-century England. In this excerpt, Engels discusses child labor and industrial accidents, which he blames on the bourgeoisie (the factory owners, or capitalists).GREAT WORKS OF LITERATURE
Das Kapital (Capital, published in three volumes from 1867 to 1895) is a monumental analysis and condemnation of the capitalist system. German political philosopher Karl Marx wrote the work with the aid of German political economist Friedrich Engels. The heart of Das Kapital lies in Marx’s political and philosophical commentary, and his moral condemnation of the capitalist system’s class structure. In this selection from volume I, Marx blasts the impersonal exploitation of workers’ labor, declaring that capital attains its end “by shortening the extent of the labourer’s life, as a greedy farmer snatches increased produce from the soil by robbing it of its fertility.”
F. Keynesian Economics
Past Masters: KeynesIn 1936 British economist John Maynard Keynes published The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. Distressed by the failure of national governments to cope with the Great Depression, Keynes rejected many assumptions of classical economics and argued that state intervention, and in particular regulation of interest rates, could control inflation and minimize unemployment. Author Robert Skidelsky examines several of the most important concepts in Keynesian thought. From The Wealth of NationsScottish economist and philosopher Adam Smith made a dramatic advance in economic theory with An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes ofthe Wealth of Nations (1776). It was the first work to establish political economy as a subject of study in its own right. Smith asserts that the distribution of wealth—which can be broken down into the basic forms of wages, rent, and profits—is most efficiently accomplished through free trade without government interference.
Malthus: From Principle of PopulationThe first version of British economist Thomas Malthus’s An Essay on the Principle of Population appeared anonymously in 1798 and achieved instant notoriety. Malthus predicted that the productive capacity of the world’s resources, especially agriculture, ultimately could never increase quickly enough to sustain the needs of a human population that was undergoing unchecked growth. This excerpt from A Summary View of the Principle of Population (1830) revealed several finer points in Malthus’s philosophy. For example, Malthus stated that natural checks on population growth, such as the limited availability of food and productive land, could work to prevent overpopulation by causing people to marry later in life and to have fewer children.
As a coherent economic theory, classical economics starts with Smith, continues with the British economists Thomas Robert Malthus and David Ricardo, and culminates in the synthesis of John Stuart Mill, who as a young man was a follower of Ricardo. Although differences of opinion were numerous among the classical economists in the three-quarters of a century between Smith's Wealth of Nations and Mill's Principles of Political Economy (1848), members of the group agreed on major principles. All believed in private property, free markets, and, in Mill's words, that “only through the principle of competition has political economy any pretension to the character of a science.” They shared Smith's strong suspicion of government and his ardent confidence in the power of self-interest represented by his famous “invisible hand,” which reconciled public benefit with individual pursuit of private gain. From Ricardo, classicists derived the notion of diminishing returns, which held that as more labor and capital were applied to land, yields after “a certain and not very advanced stage in the progress of agriculture steadily diminished.”English philosopher-economist John Stuart Mill was one of the most important thinkers of the 19th century. The son of English philosopher James Mill, he refined and elaborated on the work of his father and of English philosopher-economist Jeremy Bentham in his book Utilitarianism (1863). Utilitarian philosophers argued that all decisions could be made according to the principal of the greatest “utility,” or benefit, to the greatest number of people. In this section from the end of the work, Mill discussed the issue of criminal punishment and examined how it related to concepts of justice and fairness and to the doctrine of utility.Through Smith's emphasis on consumption, rather than on production, the scope of economics was considerably broadened. Smith was optimistic about the chances of improving general standards of life. He called attention to the importance of permitting individuals to follow their self-interest as a means of promoting national prosperity.Scottish economist and philosopher Adam Smith made a dramatic advance in economic theory with An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes ofthe Wealth of Nations (1776). It was the first work to establish political economy as a subject of study in its own right. Smith asserts that the distribution of wealth—which can be broken down into the basic forms of wages, rent, and profits—is most efficiently accomplished through free trade without government interference.Malthus, on the other hand, in his enormously influential book An Essay on the Principle of Population (1798), imparted a tone of gloom to classical economics, arguing that hopes for prosperity were fated to founder on the rock of excessive population growth. Food, he believed, would increase in arithmetic ratio (2-4-6-8-10 and so on), but population tended to double in each generation (2-4-8-16-32 and so on) unless that doubling was checked either by nature or human prudence. According to Malthus, nature's check was “positive”: “The power of population is so superior to the power of the earth to produce subsistence for man, that premature death must in some shape or other visit the human race.” The shapes it took included war, epidemics, pestilence and plague, human vices, and famine, all combining to level the world's population with the world's food supply.Malthus: From Principle of PopulationThe first version of British economist Thomas Malthus’s An Essay on the Principle of Population appeared anonymously in 1798 and achieved instant notoriety. Malthus predicted that the productive capacity of the world’s resources, especially agriculture, ultimately could never increase quickly enough to sustain the needs of a human population that was undergoing unchecked growth. This excerpt from A Summary View of the Principle of Population (1830) revealed several finer points in Malthus’s philosophy. For example, Malthus stated that natural checks on population growth, such as the limited availability of food and productive land, could work to prevent overpopulation by causing people to marry later in life and to have fewer children.The only escape from population pressure and the horrors of the positive check was in voluntary limitation of population, not by contraception, rejected on religious grounds by Malthus, but by late marriage and, consequently, smaller families. These pessimistic doctrines of classical economists earned for economics the epithet of the “dismal science.”Mill's Principles of Political Economy was the leading text on the subject until the end of the 19th century. Although Mill accepted the major theories of his classical predecessors, he held out more hope than did Ricardo and Malthus that the working class could be educated into rational limitation of their own numbers. Mill was also a reformer who was quite willing to tax inheritances heavily and even to allow government a larger role in protecting children and workers. He was far more critical than other classical economists of business behavior and favored worker ownership of factories. Mill thus represents a bridge between classical laissez-faire economics and an emerging welfare state.The classical economists also accepted Say's Law of Markets, the doctrine of the French economist Jean Baptiste Say. Say's law holds that the danger of general unemployment or “glut” in a competitive economy is negligible because supply tends to create its own matching demand up to the limit of human labor and the natural resources available for production. Each enlargement of output adds to the wages and other incomes that constitute the funds needed to purchase added output.HISTORIC DOCUMENTS Many Socialist and Communist tracts were published in the early and mid-19th century, but the succinct expression of Socialist ideas and the dramatic rhetoric helped make The Communist Manifesto (1848) the central text of modern Socialism. In this excerpt from Part I, German political philosopher Karl Marx advanced the idea that the history of society is the history of struggle between the oppressed and their oppressors. Marx based the Manifesto in part on a draft prepared by German revolutionary political economist Friedrich Engels.
In 1842 a young German economist named Friedrich Engels was sent to learn business methods at a spinning mill in Manchester, England. There he came face to face with the unfair treatment of factory workers. Soon to become the cofounder of modern Communist ideology along with German philosopher Karl Marx, Engels based his first important revolutionary writings on this experience. The Condition of the Working Class in England (1844) describes the harsh conditions faced by industrial workers, miners, and agricultural laborers in early 19th-century England. In this excerpt, Engels discusses child labor and industrial accidents, which he blames on the bourgeoisie (the factory owners, or capitalists).GREAT WORKS OF LITERATURE
Das Kapital (Capital, published in three volumes from 1867 to 1895) is a monumental analysis and condemnation of the capitalist system. German political philosopher Karl Marx wrote the work with the aid of German political economist Friedrich Engels. The heart of Das Kapital lies in Marx’s political and philosophical commentary, and his moral condemnation of the capitalist system’s class structure. In this selection from volume I, Marx blasts the impersonal exploitation of workers’ labor, declaring that capital attains its end “by shortening the extent of the labourer’s life, as a greedy farmer snatches increased produce from the soil by robbing it of its fertility.”
F. Keynesian Economics
Past Masters: KeynesIn 1936 British economist John Maynard Keynes published The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. Distressed by the failure of national governments to cope with the Great Depression, Keynes rejected many assumptions of classical economics and argued that state intervention, and in particular regulation of interest rates, could control inflation and minimize unemployment. Author Robert Skidelsky examines several of the most important concepts in Keynesian thought. From The Wealth of NationsScottish economist and philosopher Adam Smith made a dramatic advance in economic theory with An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes ofthe Wealth of Nations (1776). It was the first work to establish political economy as a subject of study in its own right. Smith asserts that the distribution of wealth—which can be broken down into the basic forms of wages, rent, and profits—is most efficiently accomplished through free trade without government interference.
Malthus: From Principle of PopulationThe first version of British economist Thomas Malthus’s An Essay on the Principle of Population appeared anonymously in 1798 and achieved instant notoriety. Malthus predicted that the productive capacity of the world’s resources, especially agriculture, ultimately could never increase quickly enough to sustain the needs of a human population that was undergoing unchecked growth. This excerpt from A Summary View of the Principle of Population (1830) revealed several finer points in Malthus’s philosophy. For example, Malthus stated that natural checks on population growth, such as the limited availability of food and productive land, could work to prevent overpopulation by causing people to marry later in life and to have fewer children.
